Tribalism – the Common Cause?

Read a moving example of reconciliation and unity during the week past.  Stuff (the news outlet) has been telling stories from the Christchurch earthquake, ten years ago.  On that day, two men were rebuilding St Paul’s church, which had collapsed in the earthquake of some months before.  As soon as this second one was over they came out to view the devastation, and immediately ran across the road to the CTV building, which had pancaked, to see how they could help.

Their story from that day is compelling reading, but one incident stands out to me.  At one point one of them, a man called Nosa, was working on top of a pile of rubble, tearing rocks of concrete out and hurling them down the slope.  He remembers being terrified standing on the rubble, as the adjacent lift shaft swayed with every aftershock, “and one was hitting every minute”, says the article.

Mr Nosa found himself working alongside a man with a “Nazi tattoo” on the side of his head. “It was an unlikely alliance that remains memorable for Nosa, who is of Pacific Island descent,” the article relates.
“He was a skinhead, and he was right standing next to me pulling people out.  He shook my hand after, so I felt that we put our differences aside [and] just put human lives first.”

Poignant.  And it triggers in me the ubiquity of tribalism.  My tribe is better than yours!
I’ve noticed this in many contexts over the years.  From the wars in Europe to the killing fields of Cambodia to the genocide in Rwanda, to … many other examples great and small.  I even notice it in sports crowds, where we Kiwis lambaste the Aussies (and they us), or where we Chiefs supporters disparage the Crusaders.  There’s something in us that loves to elevate ourselves at the expense of others; that we are the best there is, come anybody. When there is no hard evidence to that effect at all.  Why would I want to die for the Chiefs, just because I live there, against the Crusaders, who are at least my equal in every sphere?  It’s a strange conceit.

A strange conceit, to be sure, and it leads, I think, to criticism, racism, (all the other “isms”), intolerance, arrogance, judgementalism, injustice, conflict and war.  Historians sift through wars, trying to establish causes, even trying to learn from them.  I say, take any agreed cause, divide it like an avocado, and there in the centre will be the hard stone of tribalism.

Nosa and the skinhead showed that tribal differences can be laid aside in common human cause and, just that easily, tribalism can be rendered meaningless.  My tribe is actually no better than yours at all.  Peace, friend.

Ken F

Not Just a Martian Satellite

Did you notice, the UAE has just set a satellite in orbit around Mars!  The satellite’s name is Hope.

A reasonable name for a deep space explorer, surely; because Hope is so much more, and a deep human driver.

Hope lifts one’s view from hints of despair.  Holocaust survivor Victor Frankl wrote that Jewish inmates of concentration camps who retained hope stood a far better chance of survival than those who didn’t.  Hope drives the student in an important exam; Hope sustains the frail patient going into a risky operation, and the woman undergoing yet another in vitro treatment; Hope attends the sailor making her way in fog; forlorn Hope drove the rebels in Les Miserables, and Hope hoists all other uprisings; Hope makes a man stand up again, who has fallen down many times.

Hope is the subject of a well known painting by GF Watts, in which Hope is shown as a blindfolded woman with a harp, on which all the strings are broken except one, and she is listening intently, longingly for its music.  See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hope_(painting).  Some critics suggested it showed Despair more than Hope, but Hope is the conqueror of Despair, and Watts explained, “Hope need not mean expectancy. It suggests here rather the music which can come from the remaining chord.”
Others, viewing the painting negatively, thought it showed the futility of Hope without accompanying Faith.  PT Forsyth, a Scottish theologian, wrote that the image illustrated that “a loss of faith places too great a burden on hope alone”.
He may be right.  What do you think?

Hope is more than expectation.  It is an apparently irrational song issuing from the depths of a forlorn heart, and it says, “Keep going”; without succumbing to that which opposes or portends.

Hope is the heart of the Prodigal Father, watching the horizon for signs of his son’s return. (Luke 15:20)

CS Lewis defined Christian Hope as the “continual looking forward to the eternal world”.

The Bible says “we have this hope as an anchor for the soul, firm and secure. It enters the inner sanctuary behind the curtain”, and, “let us hold unswervingly to the hope we profess, for he who promised is faithful.”  (Both from the book of Hebrews.)

What kind of Hope do you have, reader?

Ken F

‘Costly Love’ is his name

by Bruce Gilberd

(Based on Mark 1:29-39, I Cor 9:16-23, and Isa 40:21-31)

I will attempt to address three questions this morning.

  1. What kind of God is God?
  2. What kind of God is my God?
  3. What kind of God is your God?

A student training for the ordained ministry went to see his tutor in theology.
“I can’t go on,” the student said.  “I don’t believe in God any more.”
“Tell me,” said the tutor, “about the God you don’t believe in.”
The student explained his current understanding of God – who he thought God is and what he is like.
“Well,” said his tutor, “I don’t believe in that kind of God either.”

In a moment I will invite you to silently consider what noun, verb, adjective best describes how you experience God at present.  The possibilities are limitless, and can change over a lifetime.  What name or description of God is most meaningful to you today, from your own experience of the Divine, and your reflections, and from your journey of faith?

Who is God to you?

[Silence … 20 secs …]

So, are some of us willing to share our key understandings of the Divine at this time?

[Sharing …]

Today’s readings abound in images, descriptions and names for God:

Isaiah:


Psalm:



Corinthians:
Mark:

the creative
majestic
empowerer
the gracious
healing
Creator
[God is beyond us, yet intimate]
the sender
the compassionate one
healer
and empowerer (through prayer)
purposeful (Jesus ‘must go on to another town’)

All this shows us that whatever our deepest understanding of God is, we can always go still deeper, and go still wider – there is always more of God to experience, receive, name, and share with others …

This raises the question of spiritual growth, of quest, of journey – ever deepening quest into God and into life; and, harvesting meanings from all our day to day experiences, both the seemingly trivial and also the significant experiences and turning points of our lives.

In the twentieth century there was a rather eccentric yet deeply insightful Anglican Bishop of California – James Pike.  He wrote a very important book [Doing the Truth] in which he made these two points.  The first is that thankfulness is the core trigger for all ethical living – and he stresses truth and costly love as essential for personal holiness and community well-being.
The second is even more relevant to our theme this morning:

  1. what we value most,
  2. to whom or what are we most attached,
  3. what we long for most, and
  4. what we would miss most if taken from us …

that is, in fact, our God!  (Whatever else we may say!)
This is quite alarming really!

  • when we are told our health is the most important
  • or even family
  • or things
  • or lifestyle, and so on …
    NO! They are not.  They can, in fact, become idols.
    A dynamic and developing relationship with the living God is to be top loyalty – then, everything else falls into its right place.  Strange that!

So, God is the one we are to love with all our heart, and mind and soul and strength … and our neighbour as ourselves.
Why?  Because he has first loved us.  That is who God is and what God does – today, in this church, and in this village.

For me, Costly love is his name; Costly love is what he does; Costly love is our calling!
Amen.

Unsinkable Jean Brown

Last blog I mused about having friends.  See here.  We’re all keen to have friends, but what if there are no friends to be had?  And there are many reasons why we might be friendless, alone.

Google has plenty to say about this.  As did our friend, Jean Brown.

An internet search shows,

  • having no friends may be discouraging, but it doesn’t mean you’re fundamentally broken! Our worth isn’t solely determined by our number of friends. Plenty of jerks have large social circles. Plenty of good people have been lonely.
  • a lack of friends is almost never because our core personality is at fault. It can be due to many things: we’re not knowledgeable about the skills for making friends; we’re shy, socially anxious, or unconfident to pursue friendships; we don’t mind being alone, and so don’t have as much motivation to go out and meet people as someone who constantly craves company; our current situation (eg, we just moved to a new city, our old friends moved away, I work a lot of hours, live in the middle of nowhere); etc.  See https://www.succeedsocially.com/nofriendsworries.
  • you don’t need a good social life to have friends. There’s a lot you can do on your own, which will give you things to talk about and lead you into company with people with similar inclinations.
  • the term ‘loner’ may have taken on some negative connotations, but it doesn’t mean being one is a bad thing, by any means.  See https://bestlifeonline.com/loner-signs/.

Get the drift?

My wife, a rest home staffer, was planning a Scottish ‘event’.  As part of her preparation she wrote to a Scottish newspaper, asking for some useful contacts for the event.  There was only one reply, from a Jean Brown.

Jean Brown, now deceased, became my wife’s lifelong pen pal!  She was a spinster from a small Scottish town, who, we learnt as time went on, had no one she could call a friend.  But she proved to be inspirational as an irrepressible loner.  She used to describe, with joy and delight, nature documentaries she watched on TV – as if she’d been personally there (in the river with the hippos), often declaring, “Aren’t we so lucky to be able to see these things, without having to go there?”  She would go on all-day outings to museums, libraries, parks, beach promenades; studying flowers and birds and maps … and describe them to us in immaculate miniature hand-writing, any mistakes lovingly corrected with tiny bits of paper and rewritten over.  And would send us clippings from newspapers and museum brochures and TV guides, and explain to us why these clippings were important to her.

Jean Brown became, for us, the quintessence of a contented friendless person, and taught us just how overrated having friends can be!

If you feel like a loner sometime, take a leaf out of Jean Brown’s playbook.