by Rev Megan Means
(Based on Luke 13:31-35; Phil 3:17-4:1)
Lately I have been delving into Paul and I have been considering … are Paul and Jesus teaching the same?
Next to Jesus, Paul was the most important person in early Christianity. Why? Because he wrote letters that have been kept and saved. He and Jesus were first century Jews, raised in Jewish households, in the Jewish context; both were deeply concerned about the Jewish Bible and the true worship of the Jewish God of Israel.
Before Paul became a storied Christian missionary to the gentiles, church founder, and a theologian, he was recorded as an arch-enemy of the Christian church. We have a record in Acts 9 that Paul was converted into faith in Christ after a visionary experience, a revelation that Jesus had been raised from the dead. Scholars think this happened about 31-32CE. After his conversion to following Jesus, Paul played an immediate significant role in the history of Christianity, while remaining a faithful Jew. He did not think Christianity as a different religion but the correct understanding of the ancient faith of Israel. Paul did not meet up with Peter, James or John, the disciples that actually met and knew Jesus first hand, until three years into his ministry, so Paul did not learn the Gospel from them.
In our New Testament, half of the books claim to be written by Paul, although we are now down to seven books that scholars agree are undisputedly his: Romans, 1&2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians and Philemon. However, realistically, only seven letters from at least thirty years ministry do not really provide a full picture of who the real Paul was or why only his letters were saved. If we are looking to understand Paul’s set of conclusions, it is mostly in Romans, and that is because Paul’s other letters were written chiefly to address specific problems that had arisen in his churches. His letters are like hearing only one side of a phone conversation. Sometimes we can piece together what the other side is talking about, and sometimes we are right, sometimes we jump to conclusions, and sometimes we may get it totally wrong.

Paul was flogged, beaten and put in prison. We tend not to focus or want to remember or accept how rugged the Roman empire was and how hard ordinary life really was. Paul’s teachings and conclusions on God’s plan regarding Jesus radically affected the beliefs of the Anointeds’ followers, later to be known as Christians.
Paul and Jesus did have in common a basic apocalyptic view of the world – the understanding that the world was mortally afflicted with evil forces opposed to God; and many Jews were convinced that God was soon to bring an end to this wicked age by sending a cosmic judge from heaven to destroy all that was evil and bring salvation for those who were his ‘faithful’. According to this view, there was to be a cataclysmic break between these ages, when God would destroy the forces of evil to bring in his Kingdom. At that time there would be a judgment of all beings, both living and dead. And this judgment was imminent. Therefore, Jesus and Paul wanted everyone to gain salvation immediately.
Paul moved Christianity forward theologically after Jesus’s death, into believing directly that the death and resurrection of Jesus was the way to salvation. Paul understood three main points: Jesus was a divine man whose death brought salvation; the Jewish Law was not now as important for a person’s standing before God, especially if you were a gentile; and the relationship between Jews and gentiles was that they were both equal before God. Jesus’s message was that God would forgive the sins of his errant children (Jewish) if they would simply repent and turn their lives around.
Both Jesus and Paul believed in caring for their neighbour. The Jewish religion of Jesus’s time and context had begun to promote caring for others, caring for neighbours, but this was radical teaching. The Roman and Greek civilisations did not practise this. Jesus’s ethics revolutionised moral thinking in western civilisation, and instigated an ethical ‘common sense’ approach which has come down to us today.
If the town next door had a flood or earthquake, a disaster, etc, no one went or helped or offered aid, in the original context. What we do now has grown from this challenge of two thousand years ago. Jesus helped instigate and influence the care for others that was beginning to occur in the Jewish setting and this set the way forward to bring about what we call today ‘social services’, from the original care for orphans, the poor, and widows, in the first century.

Jesus’s message, in a nutshell, to gain salvation with God was to repent, be forgiven and turn your lives around – now. Paul’s message to gain salvation was to believe in the death and resurrection of Jesus. God needed someone to pay with blood, and that is what Jesus did. And both Jesus and Paul believed that God had already begun to intervene in history, to overthrow the current cosmic forces of evil.
Paul wrote the letter of Philippians from prison, from an unknown location.
The letter is to the Christians, formerly pagans, in the city of Philippi (in Greece). They had been taught to worship the one true God of Israel and to expect the imminent return of his son, Jesus. Paul’s letter to them thanks them for their financial support, he shares in the joys that they were doing well, and urges them to maintain unity.
In today’s reading Paul, with tears, concedes to the knowledge that some followers are failing to fully embrace the good news of the cross of Christ. He says that some are living as enemies of the cross and are doing this openly in their midst. In other words they are only following Christ partially, and living as if Jesus’s suffering, death and resurrection had no instructional value in their lives. Paul strives to encourage them to all live in united relationships with one another and be of the same mindset as Jesus had had.
It’s also worth noting that Paul’s letters seem to be always arguing with people in the church who have different views to him! As today in some places, everyone was trying to work out the way forward from Jesus’s death and resurrection, both logically and with continuity.
Paul is also standing in the tradition of Jesus, who (in the Gospel reading) longs to shield people “as a hen gathers her brood”. Paul too, in his letters, comes across “as a hen overseeing her brood”.
Jesus and Paul were passionate teachers. Was their teaching the same or different? Are they reconcilable? Jesus’s teaching was first and all it involved was to repent, to return and accept forgiveness to gain salvation with God. Then Paul developed the theology and understanding, after Jesus died, that to gain salvation one must believe in the death and resurrection of Jesus because Christianity now required an atoning sacrifice.
Both believed in apocalyptic thinking, and that a new ‘good’ kingdom of God was imminent.
It has now been two thousand years and Jesus has not returned with God’s army “to judge the living and the dead”. And many of us today probably do not subscribe to apocalyptic thinking?
Which brings me to my ultimate question of, how did Paul and others consider their development of theology to be the right way forward? As, really, it seems to indicate that what Jesus taught was not enough.
Therefore, did Jesus and Paul advocate the same religion?

Perhaps the religion of Jesus became the religion about Jesus?
And that, folks, is a brief insight into where I am at in my world of understanding Jesus and Paul through an historical lens.





